-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tls: avoid taking ownership of OpenSSL objects #53436
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tniessen
added
tls
Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem.
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
openssl
Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency.
labels
Jun 12, 2024
Review requested:
|
nodejs-github-bot
added
crypto
Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
labels
Jun 12, 2024
anonrig
approved these changes
Jun 12, 2024
Is there a noticable performance impact of this pull-request that you know of? |
@anonrig None that I'd care to measure. Most of OpenSSL's shared ownership management is just based on reference counting so it barely has any performance impact. |
jasnell
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2024
tniessen
added
request-ci
Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR.
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
labels
Jun 13, 2024
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR.
label
Jun 13, 2024
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Looks like there are some incompatible definitions in OpenSSL 1.1.1... |
tniessen
removed
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Jun 13, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not.
tniessen
force-pushed
the
tls-no-ownership
branch
from
June 13, 2024 19:00
906bd1f
to
f974aaf
Compare
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR.
label
Jun 13, 2024
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Should be fixed. PTAL. |
anonrig
approved these changes
Jun 14, 2024
tniessen
added
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
labels
Jun 14, 2024
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
label
Jun 14, 2024
Landed in d302537 |
tniessen
added a commit
to tniessen/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. Refs: nodejs#53436
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. PR-URL: #53436 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz.nizipli@sentry.io> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
sophoniie
pushed a commit
to sophoniie/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. PR-URL: nodejs#53436 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz.nizipli@sentry.io> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
bmeck
pushed a commit
to bmeck/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. PR-URL: nodejs#53436 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz.nizipli@sentry.io> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. Refs: #53436 PR-URL: #53460 Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. Refs: #53436 PR-URL: #53460 Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. Refs: #53436 PR-URL: #53460 Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. PR-URL: #53436 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz.nizipli@sentry.io> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. PR-URL: #53436 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz.nizipli@sentry.io> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. Refs: #53436 PR-URL: #53460 Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2024
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not. Refs: #53436 PR-URL: #53460 Reviewed-By: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
crypto
Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
openssl
Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency.
tls
Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It is often unnecessary to obtain (shared) ownership of OpenSSL objects in this code, and it generally is more costly to do so as opposed to just obtaining a pointer to the respective OpenSSL object. Therefore, this patch replaces various OpenSSL function calls that take ownership with ones that do not.